1979 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 55 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda Cosmo | 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | Lancer |
Year Released | 1979 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |