1979 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Volkswagen Concept C
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Concept C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1979 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C (200 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Volkswagen Concept C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Volkswagen Concept C | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | Cosmo | Concept C |
Year Released | 1979 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |