1979 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mazda RX-2 | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-2 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3066 mm |
