1979 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR weights approximately 40 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda RX-2 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RX-2 | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2680 mm |