1979 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2009 Renault Symbol. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Symbol weights approximately 40 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 1979 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda RX-2 | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-2 | Symbol |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2473 mm |