1979 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 88 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1979 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Mazda | Honda |
| Model | RX-2 | Jazz |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1245 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 77 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1048 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2460 mm |
