1979 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2012 Renault Fluence is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Fluence weights approximately 265 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-2 | Fluence |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2702 mm |