1979 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 39 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 1979 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mercedes-Benz E | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | E | 3 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1301 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2639 mm |