1979 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1979 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | E | XC90 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |