1979 Mercury Cougar vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1979 Mercury Cougar. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1979 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mercury Cougar. (336 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mercury Cougar | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Mercury | Holden |
Model | Cougar | Calais |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 336 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |