1979 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Riley |
Model | Celeste | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1979 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1410 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2380 mm |