1979 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Celica weights approximately 115 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Celeste | Celica |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1410 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |
