1979 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva weights approximately 400 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Celeste | Achieva |
Year Released | 1979 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1410 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |