1979 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Aston Martin |
| Model | Celeste | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1410 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
