1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1962 Seat 1400
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Seat 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Seat 1400 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1962 Seat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Seat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 1962 Seat 1400 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
| Model | Colt | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2660 mm |
