1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | Colt | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2140 mm |
