1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,453 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Corona weights approximately 160 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | Corona |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2510 mm |
