1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1968 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 850 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1968 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 1968 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
| Model | Colt | Firebird |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2750 mm |
