1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1968 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Triumph Spitfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 60 kg more than 1968 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 1968 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | Colt | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2110 mm |
