1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Colt | 260 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2660 mm |