1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 545 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Matrix |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2610 mm |