1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2012 Ford Expedition is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1707 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2012 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1979 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Colt | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2517 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2002 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3023 mm |
