1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 444 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Sapporo | S40 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2720 mm |
