1979 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Bluebird | Matrix |
Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2601 mm |