1979 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1979 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1979 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1979 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 147 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Nissan | Peugeot |
Model | Cedric | 408 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |