1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 334 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1955 Singer Hunter has manual transmission. 1955 Singer Hunter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Singer |
| Model | Cutlass | Hunter |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1146 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2180 mm |
