1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 192 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | 144 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |