1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1973 Volvo 1800
To start off, 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 1800 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 290 kg more than 1973 Volvo 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1973 Volvo 1800 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | 1800 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2460 mm |