1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 382 kg more than 1988 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1988 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1988 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1988 |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |
