1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Renault Espace
To start off, 2002 Renault Espace is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Espace weights approximately 370 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Renault Espace | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | Cutlass | Espace |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3788 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2690 mm |