1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton

To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,996 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton weights approximately 815 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton
Make Oldsmobile Volkswagen
Model Cutlass Phaeton
Year Released 1979 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 5996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Horse Power 0 HP 414 HP
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1482 kg 2297 kg
Vehicle Length 5530 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2890 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]