1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 BMW M6
To start off, 2010 BMW M6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M6 weights approximately 513 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2010 BMW M6 has manual transmission. 2010 BMW M6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 BMW M6 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | BMW |
| Model | Cutlass | M6 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2781 mm |
