1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 482 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Mazda |
| Model | Cutlass | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1964 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2875 mm |
