1979 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1979 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Oldsmobile Omega (89 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 80 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Oldsmobile Omega | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Omega | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |
