1979 Opel Ascona vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1979 Opel Ascona is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Opel Ascona weights approximately 39 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1979 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Opel Ascona | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Opel | Riley |
Model | Ascona | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1979 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |