1979 Peugeot 505 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Peugeot 505. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Peugeot 505 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Peugeot 505 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1979 Peugeot 505. (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Peugeot 505. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1979 Peugeot 505. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Peugeot 505 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Peugeot 505. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (195 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Peugeot 505. (185 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Peugeot 505. 2003 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1979 Peugeot 505 has manual transmission. 1979 Peugeot 505 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Peugeot 505 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | 505 | 3 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2850 mm |