1979 Renault 15 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 15 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1979 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1979 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 910 kg more than 1979 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Renault 15 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | 15 | XF |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2909 mm |