1979 Renault 20 vs. 1995 Tata E
To start off, 1995 Tata E is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 20 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Tata E weights approximately 185 kg more than 1979 Renault 20.
Because 1995 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Renault 20 | 1995 Tata E | |
| Make | Renault | Tata |
| Model | 20 | E |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 1647 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2810 mm |
