1979 Renault 20 vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 20 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1467 kg more than 1979 Renault 20.
Because 2013 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1979 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1979 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Renault 20 | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | 20 | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1647 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3023 mm |
