1979 Renault 5 vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1979 Renault 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo 144 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Volvo 144 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1979 Renault 5.
Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Renault 5 | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | 5 | 144 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2620 mm |