1979 Renault Rodeo vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 843 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Renault Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 135 kg more than 1979 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Renault Rodeo | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Renault | Smart |
Model | Rodeo | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 843 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1820 mm |