1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2011 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 714 kg more than 2011 SsangYong Stavic.
Because 2011 SsangYong Stavic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Stavic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2011 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | SsangYong |
Model | Silver Shadow | Stavic |
Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2748 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 80 L |