1979 Seat 124 vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 124 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1979 Seat 124. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 124. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 554 kg more than 1979 Seat 124. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat 124. (90 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat 124.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Seat 124 | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Seat | Mazda |
Model | 124 | 6 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2789 mm |