1979 Seat 131 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 370 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Seat 131 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Seat | Ford |
| Model | 131 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1626 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2648 mm |
