1979 Simca 2 Litres vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 410 kg more than 1979 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1979 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1979 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1979 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Simca 2 Litres | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Simca | Chevrolet |
Model | 2 Litres | Epica |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2710 mm |