1979 Simca 2 Litres vs. 2010 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 530 kg more than 1979 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1979 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1979 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1979 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Simca 2 Litres | 2010 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Simca | Chevrolet |
Model | 2 Litres | Impala |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2807 mm |