1979 Simca 2 Litres vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Simca 2 Litres is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Simca 2 Litres weights approximately 95 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1979 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Simca 2 Litres | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Simca | Mazda |
Model | 2 Litres | 2 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2489 mm |