1979 Suzuki Cervo vs. 1969 Triumph 2000

To start off, 1979 Suzuki Cervo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (41 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Suzuki Cervo.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Suzuki Cervo 1969 Triumph 2000
Make Suzuki Triumph
Model Cervo 2000
Year Released 1979 1969
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 543 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 29 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 41 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 540 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1400 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1220 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2700 mm