1979 Suzuki Cervo vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 2,436 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1111 kg more than 1979 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (53 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Suzuki Cervo | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Cervo | Condor |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 539 cc | 2436 cc |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |
