1979 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 569 kg more than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2009 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Suzuki | Acura |
| Model | LJ 50 | CSX |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 539 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2700 mm |
